CE Waters Pty Ltd as Trustee for CE Waters Development Trust v North Sydney Council [2023] NSWLEC 1687
The Court upheld the appeal and granted development consent because, on the evidence, site observations and submissions, the proposed alterations and additions and the associated modification of the Existing Consent were within jurisdiction, the relevant s 4.15 matters and other jurisdictional pre-requisites had been addressed, the Respondent no longer pressed its contentions after gazettal of the planning proposal amendment, and objectors had been appropriately notified and heard.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application No 42/2023 / Consent Orders Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted to DA No 42/2023, as amended, subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'mixed Use Development' 'consent Orders' 'planning Proposal Amendment to Local Environmental Plan' 'conditions of Consent' 'public Participation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application No 42/2023 / Consent Orders Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the agreed consent orders granting development consent to DA No 42/2023 were within the Court's jurisdiction." 'Whether jurisdictional pre-requisites to the grant of development consent, including assessment under s 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, had been met.' 'Whether proposed Condition A1 could require modification of the Existing Consent by notice of modification under s 67 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021.' 'Whether neighbouring objectors and owners had been appropriately notified and given an opportunity to make submissions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the appeal and granted development consent because, on the evidence, site observations and submissions, the proposed alterations and additions and the associated modification of the Existing Consent were within jurisdiction, the relevant s 4.15 matters and other jurisdictional pre-requisites had been addressed, the Respondent no longer pressed its contentions after gazettal of the planning proposal amendment, and objectors had been appropriately notified and heard.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted to DA No 42/2023, as amended, subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Consent is granted to Development Application No. 42/2023, as amended, for alterations and additions to an approved mixed use development, at 12 – 14 Waters Road, Neutral Bay NSW 2089, comprising an additional level of residential accommodation and rooftop amenities and open...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment