Sullivan v Craig; Estate of O'Sullivan [2008] NSWSC 1189

Sullivan v Craig; Estate of O'Sullivan [2008] NSWSC 1189

The plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant executrix was not administering the estate properly or that there was personal impropriety, lack of conscientious performance, or malice that would justify her removal; thus, the statement of claim is dismissed.

Parties
Plaintiff: Cecile Sullivan & Ors; Defendant: Mary Craig; Defendant: The Estate of Timothy Joseph O'Sullivan
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 November 2008
Procedural Posture
Application to Revoke Grant of Probate and for Administration With Will Annexed / Final Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Removal of Executrix, Improper Administration, Malice Towards Beneficiaries
Wills Probate and Administration Removal of Executrix Improper Administration Malice Towards Beneficiaries

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cecile Sullivan & Ors

Plaintiff

Mary Craig

Defendant

The Estate of Timothy Joseph O'Sullivan

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application to Revoke Grant of Probate and for Administration With Will Annexed / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the executrix, Mary Craig, properly administered the estate of Timothy Joseph O'Sullivan
  2. 2 Whether grounds exist to remove the executrix for alleged improper administration, malice, or other matters

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant executrix was not administering the estate properly or that there was personal impropriety, lack of conscientious performance, or malice that would justify her removal; thus, the statement of claim is dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • statement of claim dismissed