Cecila Jane Filipovic v Heli Australia Pty Limited & Ors ( 20880/95);Tony Slavko Filipovic v Heli Australia Pty Limited & Ors (20881/95) [1999] NSWSC 386
Although the plaintiffs' solicitor demonstrated questionable diligence, the explanation for delay due to illness was sufficiently reasonable and there was no demonstrated actual prejudice. A further extension was warranted to allow the case to be determined on its merits.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time granted
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'limitation Period' 'amended Statement of Claim']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the limitation period for commencing action against the fifth defendant should be extended beyond the previously ordered period' 'Whether time for service of the further amended statement of claim should be extended']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the plaintiffs' solicitor demonstrated questionable diligence, the explanation for delay due to illness was sufficiently reasonable and there was no demonstrated actual prejudice. A further extension was warranted to allow the case to be determined on its merits.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time granted
Orders
- ['The limitation period for commencing an action against the estate of R J Hunt be extended up to and including 25 September 1998.' 'The time for service of the further amended statement of claim be extended up to 25 September 1998.' 'Costs are reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment