CENEPRO PTY LTD AND ANOR v GLENN PEARSON AND ASSOCIATES PTY LTD AND ANOR [1998] NSWCA 54
The application for stay was dismissed because the applicant's prospects of success on appeal were not high, the applicant failed to offer any security, there was significant delay in bringing the application, and there were unresolved concerns about the applicant’s financial position. The Pearson interests are entitled to execute on the judgment.
- Parties
- Applicant: CENEPRO PTY LTD; Respondent: GLENN PEARSON AND ASSOCIATES PTY LTD
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Judgment, Interlocutory Applications, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CENEPRO PTY LTD
Applicant
GLENN PEARSON AND ASSOCIATES PTY LTD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution pending appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for a stay, including security and delay
Ratio Decidendi
The application for stay was dismissed because the applicant's prospects of success on appeal were not high, the applicant failed to offer any security, there was significant delay in bringing the application, and there were unresolved concerns about the applicant’s financial position. The Pearson interests are entitled to execute on the judgment.
Court Disposition
Application for stay dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for stay pending appeal dismissed
- Applicant to pay the costs of the application
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment