Central Equity Ltd v Central Corporation Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 802

Central Equity Ltd v Central Corporation Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 802

The respondent deliberately adopted a trading name and logo to suggest an association with the applicant, creating a misrepresentation likely to mislead or deceive contrary to ss 52 and 53A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), even though no actual damage or passing off was established. Relief at common law was denied but an injunction was granted under statute.

Parties
Applicant: Central Equity Limited; Respondent: Central Corporation Pty. Ltd.
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 September 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Applicant's claim for passing off dismissed; injunction granted restraining respondent's infringing conduct; respondent to pay costs.
Legal Topics
Passing Off, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Trade Name Infringement, Injunctions
Trade Practices Intellectual Property Passing Off Misleading and Deceptive Conduct Trade Name Infringement Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Central Equity Limited

Applicant

Central Corporation Pty. Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether respondent's adoption of similar name and logo amounts to passing off
  2. 2 Whether respondent contravened ss 52 and 53A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by misleading or deceptive conduct or false representations of affiliation

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent deliberately adopted a trading name and logo to suggest an association with the applicant, creating a misrepresentation likely to mislead or deceive contrary to ss 52 and 53A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), even though no actual damage or passing off was established. Relief at common law was denied but an injunction was granted under statute.

Court Disposition

Applicant's claim for passing off dismissed; injunction granted restraining respondent's infringing conduct; respondent to pay costs.

Orders

  • The applicant's claim for relief at common law is dismissed.
  • The respondent by its directors, servants and agents is restrained pursuant to ss 52 and 53A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) from using (a) the name 'Central Corporation' or any colourable imitation of that name; and (b) the graphic material consisting of the assemblage of structures depicted in Exhibit C5 or...