Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner [2019] FCA 461
The test of apparent relevance for access to subpoenaed material is satisfied; the subpoenas are appropriately confined and may yield evidence relevant to key issues in the proceedings. The objections of the first respondent are rejected.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Subpoena Objections
- Outcome
- First respondent's objections rejected; applicants granted access; first respondent ordered to pay costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoenas for Production' 'access to Subpoenaed Material' 'relevance Test']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Subpoena Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicants established apparent relevance for access to subpoenaed material' 'Whether subpoenas were appropriately confined in scope' 'Whether objections to production should be sustained']
Ratio Decidendi
The test of apparent relevance for access to subpoenaed material is satisfied; the subpoenas are appropriately confined and may yield evidence relevant to key issues in the proceedings. The objections of the first respondent are rejected.
Court Disposition
First respondent's objections rejected; applicants granted access; first respondent ordered to pay costs.
Orders
- ["The first respondent's objections to the applicants having access to the material produced on subpoena by DDNS and by Telstra be rejected." 'The applicants have access forthwith to the material produced on subpoena by DDNS and by Telstra.' 'The first respondent pay the costs of and incidental to the process from...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment