Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner [2019] FCA 461

Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner [2019] FCA 461

The test of apparent relevance for access to subpoenaed material is satisfied; the subpoenas are appropriately confined and may yield evidence relevant to key issues in the proceedings. The objections of the first respondent are rejected.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Subpoena Objections
Outcome
First respondent's objections rejected; applicants granted access; first respondent ordered to pay costs.
Legal Topics
['subpoenas for Production' 'access to Subpoenaed Material' 'relevance Test']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Subpoena Objections

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicants established apparent relevance for access to subpoenaed material' 'Whether subpoenas were appropriately confined in scope' 'Whether objections to production should be sustained']

Ratio Decidendi

The test of apparent relevance for access to subpoenaed material is satisfied; the subpoenas are appropriately confined and may yield evidence relevant to key issues in the proceedings. The objections of the first respondent are rejected.

Court Disposition

First respondent's objections rejected; applicants granted access; first respondent ordered to pay costs.

Orders

  • ["The first respondent's objections to the applicants having access to the material produced on subpoena by DDNS and by Telstra be rejected." 'The applicants have access forthwith to the material produced on subpoena by DDNS and by Telstra.' 'The first respondent pay the costs of and incidental to the process from...