R v Central Reference Board; Thiess (Repairs) Pty Ltd, Ex p [1948] HCA 9

R v Central Reference Board; Thiess (Repairs) Pty Ltd, Ex p [1948] HCA 9

Thiess (Repairs) Pty Ltd was not engaged in the coal-mining industry but rather in an independent engineering business carrying out repairs, notwithstanding its close association with Thiess Bros. Pty Ltd and the substantial proportion of work for the mine. Therefore, the Central Reference Board lacked jurisdiction to order the reinstatement of Belmar, and the order nisi for prohibition should be made absolute.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Application for Prohibition / Return of Order Nisi for Prohibition
Outcome
Order nisi made absolute by majority; prohibition order granted against Central Reference Board.
Legal Topics
['jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunals' "scope of 'coal Mining Industry'" 'prohibition Orders' 'privative (ouster) Clauses']
['constitutional Law' 'industrial Law'] ['jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunals' "scope of 'coal Mining Industry'" 'prohibition Orders' 'privative (ouster) Clauses']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Prohibition / Return of Order Nisi for Prohibition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Thiess (Repairs) Pty Ltd or its employee Belmar was engaged in the coal-mining industry within the meaning of the National Security (Coal Mining Industry Employment) Regulations.' 'Whether the Central Reference Board had jurisdiction to order reinstatement of Belmar.']

Ratio Decidendi

Thiess (Repairs) Pty Ltd was not engaged in the coal-mining industry but rather in an independent engineering business carrying out repairs, notwithstanding its close association with Thiess Bros. Pty Ltd and the substantial proportion of work for the mine. Therefore, the Central Reference Board lacked jurisdiction to order the reinstatement of Belmar, and the order nisi for prohibition should be made absolute.

Court Disposition

Order nisi made absolute by majority; prohibition order granted against Central Reference Board.

Orders

  • ['Order absolute: costs of prosecutor to be paid by the respondents, the Amalgamated Engineering Union Australian Section.']