Centro Properties Pty Ltd v Albury City Council [2005] NSWLEC 721
A 12 m sign in the proposed location with a large display area is incompatible with planning controls, creates unreasonable visual impact for the adjoining residential zone, fails assessment criteria under SEPP 64, and does not justify departure from DCP standards; an 8 m sign is consistent with controls and should be approved.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; consent for 8 m sign reinstated
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'outdoor Advertising' 'signage Impact' 'zone Interface' 'consent Under Planning Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposal for a 12 m advertising sign complies with planning controls' 'Impact of sign height and bulk on adjoining residential areas' 'Compliance with Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Albury Local Environmental Plan 2000, Albury Development Control Plan 2000, and State Environmental Planning Policy No. 64']
Ratio Decidendi
A 12 m sign in the proposed location with a large display area is incompatible with planning controls, creates unreasonable visual impact for the adjoining residential zone, fails assessment criteria under SEPP 64, and does not justify departure from DCP standards; an 8 m sign is consistent with controls and should be approved.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; consent for 8 m sign reinstated
Orders
- ['The appeal for a 12 m sign on the corner of Breen Street and Griffith Road is dismissed.' 'The exhibits are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment