Ripani v Century Legend Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 289
Because the stay application was filed late and the pressures of the Court's business made it impractical for the application to be determined that day, the Court extended the time limited by Order 2 of the Orders until 4pm on Monday, 28 March 2022.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure / Determined on the Papers; Extension of Time Limited by Earlier Orders to Allow for Hearing and Determination of Stay Application
- Outcome
- Time extended.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'stay Pending Appeal' 'interlocutory Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure / Determined on the Papers; Extension of Time Limited by Earlier Orders to Allow for Hearing and Determination of Stay Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the time limited by Order 2 of the Orders made on 18 March 2022 should be extended to allow for the Respondent's stay application to be heard and determined."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the stay application was filed late and the pressures of the Court's business made it impractical for the application to be determined that day, the Court extended the time limited by Order 2 of the Orders until 4pm on Monday, 28 March 2022.
Court Disposition
Time extended.
Orders
- ['The time limited by Order 2 of the Orders made on 18 March 2022 be extended until 4pm on Monday, 28 March 2022.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment