CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 13
No evidence supported any breach of Information Privacy Principles or Health Privacy Principles by University of Technology Sydney or its staff in relation to collection, use, or disclosure of applicant's personal or health information. The actions taken in relation to internal review, disciplinary inquiries, security incident, and withholding of academic results were lawfully authorised and consistent with statutory exemptions and university policy.
- Parties
- Applicant: CEU; Respondent: University of Technology Sydney
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Determination
- Outcome
- application dismissed – no further action to be taken on the matter
- Legal Topics
- Information Privacy Principles, Health Privacy Principles, Breaches of Privacy, Personal Information, Health Information, Student Discipline, Access to Academic Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CEU
Applicant
University of Technology Sydney
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the respondent breach the applicant's privacy under Information Privacy Principles and Health Privacy Principles in relation to collection, use, and disclosure of personal and health information?
- 2 Was the respondent entitled to withhold academic results from the applicant?
- 3 Did the actions of staff and security personnel at UTS constitute breaches of the PPIP Act or HRIP Act?
Ratio Decidendi
No evidence supported any breach of Information Privacy Principles or Health Privacy Principles by University of Technology Sydney or its staff in relation to collection, use, or disclosure of applicant's personal or health information. The actions taken in relation to internal review, disciplinary inquiries, security incident, and withholding of academic results were lawfully authorised and consistent with statutory exemptions and university policy.
Court Disposition
application dismissed – no further action to be taken on the matter
Orders
- The Tribunal decides not to take any further action on the matter.
- Costs submissions to be filed following receipt of reasons, to be determined 'on the papers' unless requested otherwise.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment