CFL v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 114
The Tribunal, having considered all material and legislative requirements, found on the balance of probabilities that there is a real and appreciable risk of harm to children posed by the applicant and thus affirmed the Children's Guardian's decision to refuse a working with children check clearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed; decision of the Children's Guardian refusing clearance affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Checks' 'review of Administrative Decisions' 'risk Assessment' 'procedural Fairness' 'tribunal Powers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety, welfare and well-being of children for the purpose of granting a working with children check clearance under the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW)' "Whether the correct and preferable decision is to affirm the Children's Guardian's refusal of clearance"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal, having considered all material and legislative requirements, found on the balance of probabilities that there is a real and appreciable risk of harm to children posed by the applicant and thus affirmed the Children's Guardian's decision to refuse a working with children check clearance.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed; decision of the Children's Guardian refusing clearance affirmed.
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian dated 6 October 2015 to refuse the applicant's application for a Working with Children Check clearance is affirmed." "The application for review of the decision of the Children's Guardian filed 23 October 2015 is otherwise refused and dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment