CFS17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 831
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear, provided no substantive material or explanation, there was no merit in the proposed grounds of appeal, and the applicant was no longer in Australia and thus ineligible for the protection visa sought to be appealed.
- Parties
- Applicant: CFS17; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time—hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Procedural Default, Protection Visas
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CFS17
Applicant
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time—hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant an extension of time to appeal in circumstances where the applicant has not participated or appeared and is now offshore
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear, provided no substantive material or explanation, there was no merit in the proposed grounds of appeal, and the applicant was no longer in Australia and thus ineligible for the protection visa sought to be appealed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The name of the first respondent be amended to 'Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs'.
- The application for an extension of time be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment