CGA15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 46
The Tribunal erred in law by engaging in statistical analysis of risk to appellant in Islamabad/Rawalpindi based on the national Shia population rather than the relevant urban population, materially affecting its conclusion about whether there was a real chance of serious harm; this constituted jurisdictional error and required quashing the Tribunal's decision and a re-determination of the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'real Chance Test' 'statistical Analysis of Risk' 'relocation Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal applied the correct approach to the 'real chance' test in assessing risk of harm upon relocation." 'Whether the Tribunal engaged in a flawed statistical analysis regarding risk to the appellant in Islamabad and Rawalpindi.' 'Whether leave should be granted to raise a new ground of appeal.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by engaging in statistical analysis of risk to appellant in Islamabad/Rawalpindi based on the national Shia population rather than the relevant urban population, materially affecting its conclusion about whether there was a real chance of serious harm; this constituted jurisdictional error and required quashing the Tribunal's decision and a re-determination of the application.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Leave granted to file amended notice of appeal.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Orders of Federal Circuit Court dated 7 June 2018 set aside.' 'Order in the nature of certiorari to quash the Tribunal decision dated 28 September 2015.' "Order in the nature of mandamus requiring the Tribunal to re-determine according to law the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment