Challenger Group Holdings Ltd v Concept Equity Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 801
On construction of the contract, commission was payable under one head for mere introduction—that being the case here—without the need for effective causation. Neither lapse, abandonment, nor NSW licensing legislation prevented recovery by the defendant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Contract / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed; verdict for defendant for $2,051,500 plus interest.
- Legal Topics
- ['implied Terms' 'commission on Introduction Agreements' 'licensing of Business Agents' 'construction of Contracts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether commission under the introduction agreement is payable only if defendant’s introduction was an effective cause of the transaction' 'Whether the agreement had lapsed or was abandoned' 'Whether the defendant was precluded from claiming commission due to absence of a business agent’s licence']
Ratio Decidendi
On construction of the contract, commission was payable under one head for mere introduction—that being the case here—without the need for effective causation. Neither lapse, abandonment, nor NSW licensing legislation prevented recovery by the defendant.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed; verdict for defendant for $2,051,500 plus interest.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff’s claim dismissed.' 'Verdict for the defendant for $2,051,500 plus interest.' 'Costs stood over for later determination.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment