Karan v Champion Homes Sales Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATCD 84
The application was lodged on 15 April 2016. The Tribunal found that, independently of the contractual deeming provisions, the applicants acknowledged at the final inspection on 2 April 2009 that the premises were reasonably capable of occupation and there was no evidence of later work affecting practical completion. Practical completion therefore occurred on 2 April 2009, more than 7 years before commencement of proceedings. By operation of Sections 18E and 48K of the Home Building Act 1989, the claim was out of time and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction; it had no power to extend the limitation period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Building Claim for Alleged Breach of Statutory Warranties Under the Home Building Act 1989 / Hearing Before the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales on Jurisdiction and Limitation
- Outcome
- The application was dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- ['limitation of Actions' 'statutory Warranties' 'date of Practical Completion' 'residential Building Work' 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'adjournment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Residential Building Claim for Alleged Breach of Statutory Warranties Under the Home Building Act 1989 / Hearing Before the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales on Jurisdiction and Limitation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction given the 7 year limitation period for statutory warranties under Section 18E of the Home Building Act 1989.' 'Whether the residential building work was completed more than 7 years before the application was lodged on 15 April 2016.' 'If the Tribunal had jurisdiction, whether the applicants had established breach of statutory warranties and the appropriate remedy.' 'If the Tribunal had jurisdiction, whether the applicants should be granted an adjournment to obtain further expert evidence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was lodged on 15 April 2016. The Tribunal found that, independently of the contractual deeming provisions, the applicants acknowledged at the final inspection on 2 April 2009 that the premises were reasonably capable of occupation and there was no evidence of later work affecting practical completion. Practical completion therefore occurred on 2 April 2009, more than 7 years before commencement of proceedings. By operation of Sections 18E and 48K of the Home Building Act 1989, the claim was out of time and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction; it had no power to extend the limitation period.
Court Disposition
The application was dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed as the Tribunal has no jurisdiction.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment