Chan Industrial Pty Limited v Port Stephens Council and Anor [2004] NSWLEC 650
Clause 19(c) of the LEP and the definition of "height" were clear and unambiguous. The lower relevant level was the finished ground level of the completed building, being the basement car park floor at R.L 12.12, not the pre-construction natural ground level. Measuring vertically to the highest parapet level at R.L. 27.42 gave a height of at least 15.30 metres, so the proposed completed building exceeded the 15 metre maximum height control.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Question of Law in Land and Environment Court Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment Answering Preliminary Question of Law
- Outcome
- Preliminary question answered in the affirmative: the completed building would have exceeded 15 metres in height within the meaning of the LEP.
- Legal Topics
- ['building Height Control' 'port Stephens Local Environmental Plan 2000' 'development Control Plan Psc1' 'state Environmental Planning Policy No. 1' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Question of Law in Land and Environment Court Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment Answering Preliminary Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the completed building depicted in the plans at tab 55 in exhibit A would have exceeded 15 m in height within the meaning of Port Stephens LEP 2000 cl 19(c) and the table thereto.' 'Whether height was to be measured from the finished ground level of the completed building, including the basement car park level, or from natural ground level under the highest parapet.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 19(c) of the LEP and the definition of "height" were clear and unambiguous. The lower relevant level was the finished ground level of the completed building, being the basement car park floor at R.L 12.12, not the pre-construction natural ground level. Measuring vertically to the highest parapet level at R.L. 27.42 gave a height of at least 15.30 metres, so the proposed completed building exceeded the 15 metre maximum height control.
Court Disposition
Preliminary question answered in the affirmative: the completed building would have exceeded 15 metres in height within the meaning of the LEP.
Orders
- ['The completed building referred to at tab 55 of exhibit A would have exceeded 15 metres in height within the meaning of the Port Stephens Local Environmental Plan 2000.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment