Tredders Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for Warren Tredrea Trust v Channel 9 South Australia (No 4) [2024] FCA 453

Tredders Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for Warren Tredrea Trust v Channel 9 South Australia (No 4) [2024] FCA 453

Section 17(1) of the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth) requires that there be no order as to costs because the proceeding was not instituted vexatiously or without reasonable cause and the applicants' rejection of settlement offers did not rise to the level of an unreasonable act or omission causing the respondent to incur costs; therefore, the default no-costs rule was not displaced.

Parties
First Applicant: Tredders Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for Warren Tredrea Trust; Second Applicant: Warren Tredrea; Respondent: Channel 9 South Australia
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Application for Damages for Breach or Repudiation of Contract or Orders Varying Contract Under S 16 of the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (cth) / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Substantive Application
Outcome
No order as to costs
Legal Topics
Costs, Contracts, Independent Contractors Act 2006 (cth), Reasonable Cause in Instituting Proceedings, Offers of Settlement
Commercial Law Employment Law Costs Contracts Independent Contractors Act 2006 (cth) Reasonable Cause in Instituting Proceedings Offers of Settlement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tredders Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for Warren Tredrea Trust

First Applicant

Warren Tredrea

Second Applicant

Channel 9 South Australia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Damages for Breach or Repudiation of Contract or Orders Varying Contract Under S 16 of the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (cth) / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Substantive Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether costs should be ordered against the unsuccessful party after dismissal of an application for damages for breach or repudiation of contract or orders varying a contract under s 16 of the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth)
  2. 2 Operation of s 17 of the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth) in relation to costs
  3. 3 Whether the proceeding was instituted without reasonable cause or by an unreasonable act or omission causing the respondent to incur costs

Ratio Decidendi

Section 17(1) of the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth) requires that there be no order as to costs because the proceeding was not instituted vexatiously or without reasonable cause and the applicants' rejection of settlement offers did not rise to the level of an unreasonable act or omission causing the respondent to incur costs; therefore, the default no-costs rule was not displaced.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs

Orders

  • There be no order as to the costs of the proceeding.