Zheng v Jin [2024] NSWCA 293

Zheng v Jin [2024] NSWCA 293

Leave to appeal was refused as there were no prospects of success on any proposed ground, including the issue estoppel and Anshun estoppel findings, the limitation issues, and because no issue of public importance or clear injustice was disclosed.

Parties
Applicant: Chao Zheng; Respondent: Jun Jin
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Summary Dismissal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Issue Estoppel, Anshun Estoppel, Summary Dismissal, Limitation Period, Leave to Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chao Zheng

Applicant

Jun Jin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Summary Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether issue estoppel or Anshun estoppel barred the proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings were statute-barred
  3. 3 Whether the summary dismissal was appropriate under r 13.4 of the UCPR

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused as there were no prospects of success on any proposed ground, including the issue estoppel and Anshun estoppel findings, the limitation issues, and because no issue of public importance or clear injustice was disclosed.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal dismissed
  • Applicant to pay respondent's costs