Chapmans Ltd v Australian Stock Exchange Ltd [1996] FCA 738

Chapmans Ltd v Australian Stock Exchange Ltd [1996] FCA 738

Despite dismissal of the appeal, no order as to costs is warranted because the appellant was not entirely unsuccessful or entirely misconceived in its application.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 August 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
No order as to the costs of either party of the appeal or the proceeding at first instance.
Legal Topics
[]
[]

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Appropriate order as to costs following dismissal of appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

Despite dismissal of the appeal, no order as to costs is warranted because the appellant was not entirely unsuccessful or entirely misconceived in its application.

Court Disposition

No order as to the costs of either party of the appeal or the proceeding at first instance.

Orders

  • ['There be no order concerning the costs of either party of the appeal or the proceeding at first instance.']