Charas Developments 2 Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1367
The Court was satisfied that the agreed decision was one it could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the amended development application had owner consent, notification and submissions had been considered, applicable SEPP Housing, BASIX, contamination, vegetation, LEP and DCP matters were addressed, and the cl 4.6 written requests justified contraventions of the minimum lot size and height standards. Accordingly, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement by granting leave to amend, upholding the appeal, and granting development consent subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application No DA 276/2023 / Final Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application No 276/2023 subject to conditions of consent in Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['deemed Refusal Appeal' 'co Living Housing Development' 'amended Development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'clause 4.6 Variation' 'minimum Lot Size' 'height of Buildings' 'conditions of Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application No DA 276/2023 / Final Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend Development Application No DA 276/2023 and rely on the further amended application.' "Whether the Court could make orders granting development consent in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the proposed co-living housing development satisfied applicable environmental planning controls or justified variations to the minimum lot size and height of buildings development standards.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the agreed decision was one it could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the amended development application had owner consent, notification and submissions had been considered, applicable SEPP Housing, BASIX, contamination, vegetation, LEP and DCP matters were addressed, and the cl 4.6 written requests justified contraventions of the minimum lot size and height standards. Accordingly, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement by granting leave to amend, upholding the appeal, and granting development consent subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application No 276/2023 subject to conditions of consent in Annexure A.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend Development Application No DA 276/2023 and rely on the further amended application listed at [6] in the judgment.' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to s 8.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment