Robert Alexander v Daniel Menary [1921] HCA 34
Section 50(2) does not place the burden on the defendant for charges under section 47; the Magistrate was entitled to determine the intention of the appellants as a factual matter, and there was evidence from which the finding could be sustained.
- Parties
- Appellant: Charles Boyd Alexander; Appellant: Robert Alexander; Respondent: Daniel Menary
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 1921
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales; Decision of Magistrate Reinstated
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; orders of Supreme Court set aside; decisions of Magistrate restored
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Diseased Animals, Consignment for Sale, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Boyd Alexander
Appellant
Robert Alexander
Appellant
Daniel Menary
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales; Decision of Magistrate Reinstated
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the burden of proof provision in section 50(2) of the Cattle Slaughtering and Diseased Animals and Meat Act 1902 (NSW) apply to a charge made under section 47?
- 2 Was there evidence to support the Magistrate's finding that the animals were consigned for inspection, not for sale?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 50(2) does not place the burden on the defendant for charges under section 47; the Magistrate was entitled to determine the intention of the appellants as a factual matter, and there was evidence from which the finding could be sustained.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; orders of Supreme Court set aside; decisions of Magistrate restored
Orders
- Appeals allowed
- Orders of Supreme Court dated 3rd December 1920 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment