D'Anastasi v Environment Protection Authority [2011] NSWCA 1

D'Anastasi v Environment Protection Authority [2011] NSWCA 1

The applicant failed to establish a proper basis for a stay; there were no reasonable prospects of success shown for the appeal, and the inconvenience and disruption to the Court's business would outweigh any prospective utility of such a stay. The notice of motion was therefore dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay Pending Appeal / Application for Stay of Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal
Outcome
Notice of motion dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['stay of Execution' 'prospects of Appeal' 'environmental Regulation' 'operation of S 193']
['civil Procedure'] ['stay of Execution' 'prospects of Appeal' 'environmental Regulation' 'operation of S 193']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Stay Pending Appeal / Application for Stay of Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a stay of execution of judgment should be granted pending appeal proceedings' 'Whether the appeal has reasonable prospects of success']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to establish a proper basis for a stay; there were no reasonable prospects of success shown for the appeal, and the inconvenience and disruption to the Court's business would outweigh any prospective utility of such a stay. The notice of motion was therefore dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Notice of motion dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['Notice of motion dated 21 December 2010 filed on 24 December 2010 dismissed with costs.' 'Oral application for further extension of time from 14 January to answer the notices dismissed.']