Gant v Commissioner Australian Federal Police (No 2) [2006] FCA 1494
The orders raise important issues of law and the jurisdiction of the Federal Court under the ADJR Act, particularly in respect of s 9A, and substantial injustice would result if leave to appeal were refused; thus, leave to appeal is granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Orders' 'jurisdiction Under Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act 1977']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from interlocutory orders' 'Whether the interlocutory orders are attended with sufficient doubt and risk substantial injustice if leave is refused']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders raise important issues of law and the jurisdiction of the Federal Court under the ADJR Act, particularly in respect of s 9A, and substantial injustice would result if leave to appeal were refused; thus, leave to appeal is granted.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to appeal against orders made in QUD 325/2006 on 10 November 2006.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment