Pham v University of Queensland [2001] FCA 1044

Pham v University of Queensland [2001] FCA 1044

The applicant, having been given every opportunity to present his case or to explain adequately the need for adjournment, failed to appear or properly address the request; thus, the application is dismissed pursuant to O 32 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules.

Parties
Applicant: Charles Pham; First Respondent: University of Queensland; Second Respondent: Anor
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Adjournments, Dismissal for Want of Appearance
Practice and Procedure Adjournments Dismissal for Want of Appearance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Pham

Applicant

University of Queensland

First Respondent

Anor

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the matter should be adjourned due to the applicant's medical condition
  2. 2 Whether the proceeding should be dismissed for non-appearance of the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant, having been given every opportunity to present his case or to explain adequately the need for adjournment, failed to appear or properly address the request; thus, the application is dismissed pursuant to O 32 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • The applicant pay the respondents' costs, including reserved costs.