Chartspike Pty Ltd v Chahoud [2001] NSWSC 585
Because the plaintiff was insolvent and in liquidation, and the funding agreement allowed termination and did not give the defendant adequate protection against adverse costs, security for costs should be ordered in the sum of $60,000 with liberty to seek an increase as the hearing approached.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs in an Action in the Professional Negligence List / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Order for security for costs made.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'insolvent Company in Liquidation' 'third Party Litigation Funding' 'adverse Costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs in an Action in the Professional Negligence List / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether an insolvent plaintiff company in liquidation should provide security for the defendant's costs." "Whether the liquidator's third-party funding arrangement and indemnity gave adequate protection to the defendant against adverse costs."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the plaintiff was insolvent and in liquidation, and the funding agreement allowed termination and did not give the defendant adequate protection against adverse costs, security for costs should be ordered in the sum of $60,000 with liberty to seek an increase as the hearing approached.
Court Disposition
Order for security for costs made.
Orders
- ['The plaintiff provide security for costs to the defendant in the sum of $60,000.' "Such security may be made by bank guarantee or in such other form as is acceptable to the defendant's solicitors or to a Registrar." 'If that security is not provided by 3 August 2001 then the proceedings are stayed.' 'The plaintiff...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment