Chase Property Investments Pty Limited v Blue Mountains City Council & Anor [No 2] [2005] NSWLEC 457
Clause 10.8(e) of the LEP requires connection to the Sydney Water public reticulated sewerage system for subdivisions in the Residential Bushland Conservation Zone, not mere on-site disposal. This requirement operates as a development standard rather than a prohibition. The proposed sewage treatment plant is not a separate or independent use of land but is subordinate to the main residential/tourist development and does not render the proposal designated development under the EP&A Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: Chase Property Investments Pty Limited; First Respondent: Blue Mountains City Council; Second Respondent: Residents Against Improper Development Incorporated
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings (planning Law) / Preliminary Questions of Law in Merit Review
- Outcome
- Preliminary legal questions determined for the applicant in part and for the respondents in part.
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Subdivision, Designated Development, Development Standards, Sewage and Effluent Disposal, Construction of Planning Instruments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chase Property Investments Pty Limited
Applicant
Blue Mountains City Council
First Respondent
Residents Against Improper Development Incorporated
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings (planning Law) / Preliminary Questions of Law in Merit Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development is prohibited by cl 10.8(e) of the Blue Mountains Local Environmental Plan 1991 because it cannot be serviced by a reticulated sewerage system
- 2 Whether cl 10.8(e) operates as a development standard
- 3 Whether development application no. X05/0412 is designated development under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 10.8(e) of the LEP requires connection to the Sydney Water public reticulated sewerage system for subdivisions in the Residential Bushland Conservation Zone, not mere on-site disposal. This requirement operates as a development standard rather than a prohibition. The proposed sewage treatment plant is not a separate or independent use of land but is subordinate to the main residential/tourist development and does not render the proposal designated development under the EP&A Act.
Court Disposition
Preliminary legal questions determined for the applicant in part and for the respondents in part.
Orders
- The proper construction of cl 10.8(e) of the Blue Mountains Local Environmental Plan 1991 requires that the development be serviced by a Sydney Water reticulated sewerage system.
- Clause 10.8(e) operates as a development standard.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment