Akhtar v Chowdhury [2019] NSWCATAP 243
There was sufficient evidence before the Tribunal to establish liability for compensation for damage to the kitchen, bathroom, carpet, and other items. The Tribunal applied the correct legal test objectively assessing fair wear and tear and the relevant evidence. Written reasons met statutory and legal standards, and Tribunal had jurisdiction as parties were residents of New South Wales when proceedings commenced. Grounds of appeal were not made out, no error of law established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['compensation for Damage' 'fair Wear and Tear' 'adequacy of Reasons' 'jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Jurisdiction of Tribunal in disputes between residents of different states' 'Liability of tenant for compensation for damage exceeding fair wear and tear' 'Adequacy of reasons given by Tribunal' 'Application of correct legal test for damage assessment']
Ratio Decidendi
There was sufficient evidence before the Tribunal to establish liability for compensation for damage to the kitchen, bathroom, carpet, and other items. The Tribunal applied the correct legal test objectively assessing fair wear and tear and the relevant evidence. Written reasons met statutory and legal standards, and Tribunal had jurisdiction as parties were residents of New South Wales when proceedings commenced. Grounds of appeal were not made out, no error of law established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The Appeal is dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment