Checked-Out Pty Ltd v Eagle Eye Inspections Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1179

Due to non-compliance with directions regarding preparation for hearing and late provision of significant evidence, the hearing date should not be confirmed and further directions are necessary before trial.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 01 October 2003
Procedural Posture: Civil / Directions Hearing
Outcome: Hearing dates vacated; matter listed for directions; costs reserved
Legal Topics: ['copyright Infringement' 'copyright Ownership' 'directions Hearings' 'preparation for Trial']

['intellectual Property'] ['copyright Infringement' 'copyright Ownership' 'directions Hearings' 'preparation for Trial']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Civil / Directions Hearing

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether the applicant owns copyright in certain literary works described as 'the applicant's software' and 'the applicant's documents'" "Whether the respondents infringed the applicant's copyright" 'Compliance with court directions regarding preparation for hearing']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Hearing dates vacated; matter listed for directions; costs reserved

Orders

['Leave granted to first to fifth respondents to file affidavits of Michael Henry Atkinson sworn 30 September 2003.' 'Hearing dates fixed provisionally for 13 October 2003 to 17 October 2003 be vacated.' 'Proceeding to be listed for directions and any current notices of motion on Thursday 16 October 2003 at 10.15...

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.