Tiew v R [2020] NSWCCA 234
The failure to make an express finding on remorse was an error, but having made its own finding of genuine remorse, the Court determined no lesser sentence was warranted in law, given the applicant's key role, the seriousness of the offence, and the lack of mitigating subjective circumstances beyond those accepted by the sentencing judge. No error was demonstrated in relation to aggravating factors or parity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence From District Court of NSW
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'drug Offences' 'objective Seriousness' 'remorse' 'parity of Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence From District Court of NSW
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred by double counting factors of aggravation' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to make a finding as to remorse' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentence lacked parity with sentence of co-offender']
Ratio Decidendi
The failure to make an express finding on remorse was an error, but having made its own finding of genuine remorse, the Court determined no lesser sentence was warranted in law, given the applicant's key role, the seriousness of the offence, and the lack of mitigating subjective circumstances beyond those accepted by the sentencing judge. No error was demonstrated in relation to aggravating factors or parity.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted so far as necessary, including respect to the filing of the application for leave out of time.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment