Chen v R [2009] NSWCCA 157
The error in the Agreed Statement of Facts did not materially affect the sentencing process, as the sentencing judge used the accurate schedule of transactions. The sentences imposed reflected the objective seriousness of the offences, including the applicant's involvement in an organised, commercial operation supplying substantial quantities of methylamphetamine. The sentences were not manifestly excessive.
- Parties
- Applicant: Chen Chien Chen; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence and Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeal Against Sentence, Possession of Prohibited Weapon
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chen Chien Chen
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence and Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding the quantity and frequency of drug supply
- 3 Whether an error in the Agreed Statement of Facts affected the sentencing process
Ratio Decidendi
The error in the Agreed Statement of Facts did not materially affect the sentencing process, as the sentencing judge used the accurate schedule of transactions. The sentences imposed reflected the objective seriousness of the offences, including the applicant's involvement in an organised, commercial operation supplying substantial quantities of methylamphetamine. The sentences were not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment