Cheng XI Shipyard v The Ship 'Falcon Trident' [2006] FCA 759
Despite the apparent strength of the plaintiff's case, the plaintiff being ordinarily resident outside Australia and having no assets within the jurisdiction is sufficient to justify an order for security for costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs / Interlocutory (before Trial)
- Outcome
- Security for costs order made; proceedings stayed pending provision of security.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'jurisdiction' 'stay of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs / Interlocutory (before Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff should be ordered to give security for costs under s 56 of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the apparent strength of the plaintiff's case, the plaintiff being ordinarily resident outside Australia and having no assets within the jurisdiction is sufficient to justify an order for security for costs.
Court Disposition
Security for costs order made; proceedings stayed pending provision of security.
Orders
- ['The plaintiff give security in a form satisfactory to the Registrar for the payment of costs that may be awarded against it in the sum of $65,000.' 'Pending the provision of security, this proceeding be stayed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment