Burch v Cone [2009] NSWSC 1430

Burch v Cone [2009] NSWSC 1430

The plaintiff beneficially owned all money used to purchase the Coutts Crossing property, the defendant had no interest in the Cedar Creek proceeds, and no contract or contrary intention rebutted the resulting trust. The defendant therefore held his registered one-half interest on trust for the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff's beneficial property secured mortgage advances used 61.75% for the defendant's benefit, an equity of exoneration required the defendant to indemnify her for 61.75% of all secured mortgage liabilities. The admitted and proven funding of the chattels required declarations that the Nissan truck was held absolutely for the plaintiff and the generator and brick-making...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Concerning Resulting Trust, Beneficial Ownership and Exoneration / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Plaintiff substantially successful; declarations and orders made in her favour.
Legal Topics
['resulting Trust' 'equity of Exoneration' 'beneficial Ownership' 'mortgage Indemnity' 'constructive Trust']
['equity' 'trusts' 'property Law'] ['resulting Trust' 'equity of Exoneration' 'beneficial Ownership' 'mortgage Indemnity' 'constructive Trust']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings Concerning Resulting Trust, Beneficial Ownership and Exoneration / Principal Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant held his undivided one-half interest in the Coutts Crossing property on resulting trust for the plaintiff.' 'Whether the defendant had any entitlement to the Cedar Creek sale proceeds or Coutts Crossing property because of work done at Cedar Creek or an alleged oral contract.' 'Whether the plaintiff was entitled to exoneration or indemnity for the proportion of mortgage liability referable to benefits received by the defendant.' 'Whether the defendant held the Nissan truck, diesel generator and brick-making machine on trust for the plaintiff or in specified proportions.']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff beneficially owned all money used to purchase the Coutts Crossing property, the defendant had no interest in the Cedar Creek proceeds, and no contract or contrary intention rebutted the resulting trust. The defendant therefore held his registered one-half interest on trust for the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff's beneficial property secured mortgage advances used 61.75% for the defendant's benefit, an equity of exoneration required the defendant to indemnify her for 61.75% of all secured mortgage liabilities. The admitted and proven funding of the chattels required declarations that the Nissan truck was held absolutely for the plaintiff and the generator and brick-making...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff substantially successful; declarations and orders made in her favour.

Orders

  • ['Declare that the defendant Anthony Charles Cone holds the undivided one-half interest in the whole of the land in Folio Identifier 184/752810 (being Lot 184 Kangaroo Creek Road Coutts Crossing) of which he is the registered proprietor upon trust absolutely for the plaintiff.' 'Order that the said defendant execute...