Cheryl Lang and Snow White Child Care Centre [1995] IRCA 2
The Applicant was dismissed unlawfully, as the allegations of serious misconduct were not substantiated, the employer failed to ensure procedural fairness, and the true reason for dismissal related to union activity, contravening the Industrial Relations Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 170 EA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Allegations against the Applicant dismissed. Employer ordered to pay compensation.
- Legal Topics
- ['unlawful Termination' 'procedural Fairness' 'union Activity' 'serious Misconduct' 'employment Compensation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 170 EA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the termination of employment was unlawful under the Industrial Relations Act 1988' 'Whether the Applicant was afforded procedural fairness' "Whether the Applicant's union activity contributed to her dismissal" 'Whether allegations of serious misconduct (physical abuse) were substantiated']
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant was dismissed unlawfully, as the allegations of serious misconduct were not substantiated, the employer failed to ensure procedural fairness, and the true reason for dismissal related to union activity, contravening the Industrial Relations Act.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Allegations against the Applicant dismissed. Employer ordered to pay compensation.
Orders
- ['The allegations against the Applicant are dismissed.' 'The Respondent to pay to the Applicant the sum of $6000 within one month of the date of these proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment