R v Green; Ex parte Cheung Cheuk To [1965] HCA 32
The applicant’s certificate of exemption was lawfully issued; he was a prohibited immigrant at the expiry of his permit and subject to deportation. The relevant provisions of the Migration Act are constitutionally valid. The detention pending deportation was lawful despite any irregularity in arrest procedure. The Supreme Court lost jurisdiction once constitutional validity was raised.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Habeas Corpus / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Order nisi discharged with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['deportation' 'habeas Corpus' 'constitutional Validity of Statutes' 'temporary Entry Permits']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Habeas Corpus / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant’s detention pending deportation under the Migration Act was unlawful' 'Whether the deportation order was validly made under s. 18 of the Migration Act' 'Whether ss. 6(5), 6(6), and 7 of the Migration Act are constitutionally invalid' "Whether the applicant's detention was unlawful due to procedural non-compliance with s. 39(2) of the Migration Act" 'Whether the Supreme Court of Victoria retained jurisdiction once a constitutional question arose']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant’s certificate of exemption was lawfully issued; he was a prohibited immigrant at the expiry of his permit and subject to deportation. The relevant provisions of the Migration Act are constitutionally valid. The detention pending deportation was lawful despite any irregularity in arrest procedure. The Supreme Court lost jurisdiction once constitutional validity was raised.
Court Disposition
Order nisi discharged with costs.
Orders
- ['Order nisi for habeas corpus discharged with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment