CHH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1278
The appeal failed because none of the grounds demonstrated error by the Federal Circuit Court Judge or jurisdictional error by the Tribunal. The Tribunal had given the appellant opportunities to attend hearings, present evidence and provide further material, no witness details or additional material were provided, and the complaints were either unsupported, lacked particularity or challenged the merits. Although the s 438 certificate was invalid, it related only to confirmation of biographical information and there was no realistic possibility that notification of it could have produced a different outcome.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia's Judicial Review of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection (class Xa) Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection (class Xa) Visa' 'complementary Protection' 'procedural Fairness' 'jurisdictional Error' 'invalid S 438 Certificate' 'tribunal Credibility Findings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia's Judicial Review of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection (class Xa) Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court Judge erred in not finding jurisdictional error by the Tribunal in relation to alleged denial of an opportunity to submit further testimony or evidence.' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court Judge erred in relation to alleged failure by the Tribunal to consider witnesses or witness evidence.' "Whether the Tribunal failed to afford procedural fairness or failed properly to consider the appellant's protection claims." 'Whether an invalid certificate purportedly issued under s 438 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) gave rise to jurisdictional error.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal failed because none of the grounds demonstrated error by the Federal Circuit Court Judge or jurisdictional error by the Tribunal. The Tribunal had given the appellant opportunities to attend hearings, present evidence and provide further material, no witness details or additional material were provided, and the complaints were either unsupported, lacked particularity or challenged the merits. Although the s 438 certificate was invalid, it related only to confirmation of biographical information and there was no realistic possibility that notification of it could have produced a different outcome.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant must pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment