Chiefton Management Pty Limited and Martin Anthony Purvis [1996] IRCA 76

Chiefton Management Pty Limited and Martin Anthony Purvis [1996] IRCA 76

Because the preliminary question involved both whether any relevant legal relationship existed and, if so, the character of that relationship, and Marshall J dealt only with the employer/employee character while the evidence and issues concerning the existence of a relationship were confused, the appropriate course...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Leave From an Interlocutory Judgment of a Single Judge of the Industrial Relations Court of Australia / Interlocutory Appeal Concerning a Preliminary Question
Outcome
The interlocutory orders and preliminary issue direction were set aside, and the matter was to be listed before Marshall J for a directions hearing to facilitate an early hearing of the whole matter.
Legal Topics
['employer/employee Relationship' 'principal/independent Contractor Relationship' 'existence of Relevant Legal Relationship' 'preliminary Question' 'interlocutory Appeal' 'remittal to Trial Judge']
['industrial Relations' 'employment Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['employer/employee Relationship' 'principal/independent Contractor Relationship' 'existence of Relevant Legal Relationship' 'preliminary Question' 'interlocutory Appeal' 'remittal to Trial Judge']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal by Leave From an Interlocutory Judgment of a Single Judge of the Industrial Relations Court of Australia / Interlocutory Appeal Concerning a Preliminary Question

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the preliminary question included the issue whether there was any relevant legal relationship between Martin Anthony Purvis and Chiefton Management Pty Limited.' 'Whether Marshall J failed to determine the issue whether there was any relevant legal relationship between the parties.' 'Whether the matter should be referred back to Marshall J for proper investigation of the relevant parties and relationship.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the preliminary question involved both whether any relevant legal relationship existed and, if so, the character of that relationship, and Marshall J dealt only with the employer/employee character while the evidence and issues concerning the existence of a relationship were confused, the appropriate course was to set aside the interlocutory orders and the direction for determination of the preliminary issue and have the matter listed before Marshall J for directions to facilitate an early hearing of the whole matter.

Court Disposition

The interlocutory orders and preliminary issue direction were set aside, and the matter was to be listed before Marshall J for a directions hearing to facilitate an early hearing of the whole matter.

Orders

  • ['Set aside the orders made by Marshall J on 29 September 1995.' 'Set aside the direction of Deputy District Registrar Richardson made on 20 July 1995 for the determination of the preliminary issue.' 'In lieu of those orders, direct that the matter be listed for a telephone or video directions hearing before...