R v Reynolds [2023] NSWDC 152
Given the objective seriousness of the offending, including the transmission and possession of large volumes of material depicting child abuse, use of sophisticated methods of concealment, and the necessity of a strong message of general deterrence, along with the subjective circumstances including mental health conditions, genuine remorse, early guilty pleas and progress in rehabilitation, a fulltime custodial sentence is the only appropriate penalty. The sentence imposed balances these considerations, applying statutory requirements and affording appropriate discount for the plea and subjective factors.
- Parties
- Crown: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Offender: Cody Michael Reynolds
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and fulltime custodial sentence with recognizance release order.
- Legal Topics
- Child Abuse Material, Use Carriage Service to Transmit/publish/promote Child Abuse, Possess/control Child Abuse Material, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
Crown
Cody Michael Reynolds
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for using a carriage service to transmit child abuse material and possessing or controlling child abuse material using a carriage service; assessment of objective and subjective seriousness; application of sentencing principles including general and specific deterrence, denunciation, rehabilitation, extra-curial punishment, and impact of mental health diagnoses
Ratio Decidendi
Given the objective seriousness of the offending, including the transmission and possession of large volumes of material depicting child abuse, use of sophisticated methods of concealment, and the necessity of a strong message of general deterrence, along with the subjective circumstances including mental health conditions, genuine remorse, early guilty pleas and progress in rehabilitation, a fulltime custodial sentence is the only appropriate penalty. The sentence imposed balances these considerations, applying statutory requirements and affording appropriate discount for the plea and subjective factors.
Court Disposition
Conviction and fulltime custodial sentence with recognizance release order.
Orders
- Convicted on Sequence 1 (s474.22(1) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)), sentenced to 4 months imprisonment.
- Convicted on Sequence 3 (s474.22A(1) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)), sentenced to 2 years 8 months imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment