McEWEN v SIMMONS & ANOR [2008] NSWSC 1292
The court held that the word 'person' as used in the relevant statutory definitions included fictional or imaginary characters, such as those depicted in cartoons, and the fact that the figures departed from realistic representation did not preclude them being persons within the statutory meaning. The Magistrate did not err in finding the depictions were of persons for the purposes of the offences. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Conviction in Local Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['child Pornography' "interpretation of 'person' in Statutory Offences" 'application of Legislation to Fictional Characters' 'pictorial Versus Literary Representation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Conviction in Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether cartoon depictions of fictional characters (modelled on 'The Simpsons') constitute depictions of a 'person' within s 474.19(1)(a)(i) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) and s 91H(3) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)" 'Whether the statutory offences apply to imaginary or fictional representations and not just real persons']
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the word 'person' as used in the relevant statutory definitions included fictional or imaginary characters, such as those depicted in cartoons, and the fact that the figures departed from realistic representation did not preclude them being persons within the statutory meaning. The Magistrate did not err in finding the depictions were of persons for the purposes of the offences. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Each party to pay its own costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment