Vasram v AMP Life Limited [2002] FCA 1286
Indemnity costs should be awarded for part of the proceedings (since 8 October 2001) due to the applicant's and solicitor's unreasonable persistence with hopeless claims and failure to heed judicial warnings, with the applicant to pay party and party costs and the applicant's solicitor personally liable for the difference between party and party costs and indemnity costs from 8 October 2001.
- Parties
- Applicant: Chiman Lal Vasram; Respondent: AMP Life Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Dismissal, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs order made: applicant to pay respondent's costs on party and party basis; applicant's solicitor personally liable for difference between party and party costs and indemnity costs from 8 October 2001.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Party and Party Costs, Costs Order Against Solicitor
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chiman Lal Vasram
Applicant
AMP Life Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Dismissal, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded for the whole or part of the proceedings
- 2 Whether the applicant's solicitor should bear part of the award of indemnity costs
- 3 Circumstances in which appropriate to make costs order against applicant's solicitor
Ratio Decidendi
Indemnity costs should be awarded for part of the proceedings (since 8 October 2001) due to the applicant's and solicitor's unreasonable persistence with hopeless claims and failure to heed judicial warnings, with the applicant to pay party and party costs and the applicant's solicitor personally liable for the difference between party and party costs and indemnity costs from 8 October 2001.
Court Disposition
Costs order made: applicant to pay respondent's costs on party and party basis; applicant's solicitor personally liable for difference between party and party costs and indemnity costs from 8 October 2001.
Orders
- Subject to previous costs orders, the applicant pay the respondent's costs in this proceeding assessed on a party and party basis.
- The applicant's solicitor pay the difference between the respondent's costs from 8 October 2001 assessed on a party and party basis and the amount of those costs assessed on an indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment