Chino Pty Limited v Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation and Anor (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 99
Applying the additional valuation evidence and the risk factors identified in the earlier judgment, the Court selected a 6.25 per cent after capitalisation rate and five years of rental income for the Applicant, and a seven per cent after capitalisation rate and four years of rental income for the Council. On that basis, with the accepted Lot 16 and disturbance amounts, the Court made final compensation orders under s 55 of the Just Terms Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Proceedings Under the Land Acquisition (just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 / Final Orders Following Additional Valuation Evidence
- Outcome
- Final compensation orders made; costs reserved; exhibits to be returned.
- Legal Topics
- ['just Terms Compensation' 'valuation Evidence' 'capitalisation Rates' 'disturbance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Compensation Proceedings Under the Land Acquisition (just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 / Final Orders Following Additional Valuation Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What final compensation should be ordered for the Applicant under s 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991.' 'What final compensation should be ordered for Willoughby City Council under s 55(a) and (f) of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991.' 'What after capitalisation rates and periods of rental income should be applied to reflect risk factors in the after scenario.']
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the additional valuation evidence and the risk factors identified in the earlier judgment, the Court selected a 6.25 per cent after capitalisation rate and five years of rental income for the Applicant, and a seven per cent after capitalisation rate and four years of rental income for the Council. On that basis, with the accepted Lot 16 and disturbance amounts, the Court made final compensation orders under s 55 of the Just Terms Act.
Court Disposition
Final compensation orders made; costs reserved; exhibits to be returned.
Orders
- ['In relation to the Applicant, the Applicant is entitled to compensation pursuant to s 55(a) and (f) of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 in the sum of $3,585,000.' 'In relation to the Applicant, the Applicant is entitled to compensation pursuant to s 55(d) of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment