Chirray v Christoforidis [1966] NSWCA 1
The damages awarded (£7,000 general damages plus £324.5.0 out-of-pocket expenses) were found to be out of proportion and obviously excessive. The Court exercised its jurisdiction under s160A, with both parties' consent, to assess a fair amount of £4,324.5.0 in damages.
- Parties
- Appellant: Chirray; Respondent: Christoforidis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 1966
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Damages, Appeal of Damages, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chirray
Appellant
Christoforidis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the damages awarded by the jury were excessive
- 2 Appropriate quantum of damages for personal injuries
Ratio Decidendi
The damages awarded (£7,000 general damages plus £324.5.0 out-of-pocket expenses) were found to be out of proportion and obviously excessive. The Court exercised its jurisdiction under s160A, with both parties' consent, to assess a fair amount of £4,324.5.0 in damages.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal upheld with costs
- Verdict set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment