CHK v Children’s Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 276
On the balance of probabilities, there is no real and appreciable risk of harm to children posed by the applicant; the applicant is at low risk of future offending, and the evidence does not support refusal of a Working with Children Check clearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Decision of Children's Guardian set aside; Applicant granted Working with Children Check clearance.
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'merits Review' 'risk Assessment' 'sexual Assault Allegations' 'domestic Violence Reports']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children' "Whether the Tribunal should affirm, vary, set aside or substitute the Children's Guardian's decision to refuse a Working with Children Check clearance"]
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, there is no real and appreciable risk of harm to children posed by the applicant; the applicant is at low risk of future offending, and the evidence does not support refusal of a Working with Children Check clearance.
Court Disposition
Decision of Children's Guardian set aside; Applicant granted Working with Children Check clearance.
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian dated 23 November 2015 to refuse the Applicant's Working with Children Check clearance is set aside." 'In substitution for that decision, the following decision is made: The Applicant is granted a Working with Children Check clearance.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment