Loo, in the matter of Halifax Investment Services Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Quinlan (Liquidator) (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 204
There was no reason to depart from the usual rule that costs follow the event; costs should not be ordered on an indemnity basis because there was no improper conduct by Mr Loo.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Appellant ordered to pay costs
- Legal Topics
- ['costs on Appeal' 'corporate Insolvency' 'judicial Advice to Liquidators']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs of appeal should follow the event' 'Whether costs should be payable on an indemnity basis in a corporate insolvency matter involving judicial advice']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no reason to depart from the usual rule that costs follow the event; costs should not be ordered on an indemnity basis because there was no improper conduct by Mr Loo.
Court Disposition
Appellant ordered to pay costs
Orders
- ['The appellant pay the costs of the first, second, third and fourth respondents of and incidental to the application for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal, the application for leave to appeal and the appeal, such costs to be on a party-party basis, as agreed or taxed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment