Wade v Lord Howe Island Board Administration Office [2020] NSWCATAD 190
The Board's consideration and refusal of Mr Wade's application to bring a motor vehicle onto Lord Howe Island, including the review process, formed part of its statutory, adjudicative and deliberative function of controlling and managing the affairs of the Island. On the reasoning in IW v City of Perth, that process was either not a 'service' at all or, if characterised as a service, it was a service that was provided because the application was considered. The refusal of approval was therefore not capable of amounting to a refusal to provide a service, and there was no allegation that any decision-making service was provided on discriminatory terms. The alleged facts, even if proven,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Discrimination Complaint on Grounds of Disability and Age Under the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 / Respondent's Application for Summary Dismissal Before the Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['age Discrimination' 'disability Discrimination' 'provision of Services' 'summary Dismissal' 'lord Howe Island Vehicle Approval']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Discrimination Complaint on Grounds of Disability and Age Under the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 / Respondent's Application for Summary Dismissal Before the Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Lord Howe Island Board, in considering and refusing Mr Wade's application to bring a motor vehicle onto Lord Howe Island and upholding that refusal on review, was providing a 'service' for the purposes of sections 49M(1) and 49ZYN of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977." "Whether the Board's refusal of approval was capable of amounting to a refusal to provide a service or discrimination in the terms on which a service was provided." 'Whether the proceedings were lacking in substance or otherwise disclosed no contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 or Anti-Discrimination Regulation 2019.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Board's consideration and refusal of Mr Wade's application to bring a motor vehicle onto Lord Howe Island, including the review process, formed part of its statutory, adjudicative and deliberative function of controlling and managing the affairs of the Island. On the reasoning in IW v City of Perth, that process was either not a 'service' at all or, if characterised as a service, it was a service that was provided because the application was considered. The refusal of approval was therefore not capable of amounting to a refusal to provide a service, and there was no allegation that any decision-making service was provided on discriminatory terms. The alleged facts, even if proven,...
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to section 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 and section 102 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977, the proceedings are dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment