Acuna v Apple Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATCD 53

Acuna v Apple Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATCD 53

The Tribunal found that the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to establish either a lack of due care and skill on the part of the respondent or misleading conduct. The lack of specificity and expert evidence meant the Tribunal could not resolve the technical issues or assess compensable loss. Therefore, no breach or compensable loss was established, and the claim was dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Christian Acuna; Respondent: Apple Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Consumer Claim / Final Determination
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Consumer Guarantees, Misleading Conduct, Compensation, Jurisdiction, Assessment of Damages
Consumer Law Consumer Guarantees Misleading Conduct Compensation Jurisdiction Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christian Acuna

Applicant

Apple Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Consumer Claim / Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Apple Pty Ltd breached the guarantee to render services with due care and skill under section 60 of the Australian Consumer Law (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether Apple Pty Ltd engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct under section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (NSW)
  3. 3 Whether the applicant suffered compensable loss resulting from the conduct of the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to establish either a lack of due care and skill on the part of the respondent or misleading conduct. The lack of specificity and expert evidence meant the Tribunal could not resolve the technical issues or assess compensable loss. Therefore, no breach or compensable loss was established, and the claim was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The Tribunal orders that the application is dismissed.