KHALIFEH v DISTRICT COURT & ANOR [2001] NSWCA 333
A person not registered under the Physiotherapists Registration Act 1945 cannot lawfully use the title 'physical therapist', and mere use of the title by such a person establishes guilt for the statutory offence, regardless of belief, intent, or nursing registration.
- Parties
- Applicant: Christian Khalifeh; First Opponent: District Court; Second Opponent: Physiotherapists Registration Board
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination on Prerogative Relief Following District Court Conviction and Appeal
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Use of Professional Titles, Physiotherapists Registration Act 1945 S26(1)(b), Nursing and Physiotherapy Practice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christian Khalifeh
Applicant
District Court
First Opponent
Physiotherapists Registration Board
Second Opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination on Prerogative Relief Following District Court Conviction and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a registered nurse can use the title 'physical therapist' without registration under the Physiotherapists Registration Act 1945
- 2 Proper construction of s26(1)(b) of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
A person not registered under the Physiotherapists Registration Act 1945 cannot lawfully use the title 'physical therapist', and mere use of the title by such a person establishes guilt for the statutory offence, regardless of belief, intent, or nursing registration.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Summons dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment