Christina Sultan Dogan v LLoyds Vineyard [1996] IRCA 29

The Court found that the applicant had resigned on 30 June 1995 and that her employment was not terminated at the initiative of the employer. Accordingly, the application must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 06 February 1996
Procedural Posture: Remedy Application Under Division 3 of Part VIA of the Industrial Relations Act / Judgment
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: ['unlawful Termination' 'resignation' 'casual Employment' 'termination of Employment']

['industrial Law'] ['unlawful Termination' 'resignation' 'casual Employment' 'termination of Employment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Remedy Application Under Division 3 of Part VIA of the Industrial Relations Act / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether there was a termination at the initiative of the employer or a resignation by the employee' 'Whether the applicant was excluded by virtue of Regulation 30B of the Industrial Relations Regulations']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant had resigned on 30 June 1995 and that her employment was not terminated at the initiative of the employer. Accordingly, the application must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

['That the application is dismissed.']