Re Estate Buxton; Knoll v Buxton [2023] NSWSC 819

Re Estate Buxton; Knoll v Buxton [2023] NSWSC 819

Christine is left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance and advancement and is entitled to orders for provision under Succession Act 2006 (NSW). The Bishops Bridge property reflects co-ownership, but family provision orders justify transfer of the estate's share to Christine, with adjustment orders concerning Kurri Kurri and Westbrook. Corey is entitled by estoppel and constructive trust to the transfer of the Westbrook property, subject to repayment of debts and indemnity as outlined.

Parties
Plaintiff: Christine Gay Knoll; Defendant/executrix of the Estate of the Deceased: Suzanne Lee Buxton; Second Cross Claimant: Corey Duncan; Interested Party (non Joined, Assignment of Interest to Corey): Chelsea (surname not provided)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Family Provision and Associated Equitable Claims / Principal Judgment After Hearing and Submissions
Outcome
Orders proposed and to be settled; principal judgment for Christine's family provision claim upheld, Corey's cross-claim upheld, estate's trust cross-claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Family Provision, Trusts, Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, De Facto Relationships, Estate Administration
Equity Succession Family Provision Trusts Constructive Trust Proprietary Estoppel De Facto Relationships Estate Administration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 15
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christine Gay Knoll

Plaintiff

Suzanne Lee Buxton

Defendant/executrix of the Estate of the Deceased

Corey Duncan

Second Cross Claimant

Chelsea (surname not provided)

Interested Party (non Joined, Assignment of Interest to Corey)

Procedural Posture

Family Provision and Associated Equitable Claims / Principal Judgment After Hearing and Submissions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff (Christine Gay Knoll), former de facto partner, is entitled to family provision from the estate of Graeme Ashley Kenneth Buxton under Chapter 3 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
  2. 2 What is the beneficial ownership as between Christine, the Estate, and Corey to the Bishops Bridge, Kurri Kurri and Westbrook properties?
  3. 3 Whether an estoppel or constructive trust arises in favour of Corey and Chelsea regarding the Westbrook property

Ratio Decidendi

Christine is left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance and advancement and is entitled to orders for provision under Succession Act 2006 (NSW). The Bishops Bridge property reflects co-ownership, but family provision orders justify transfer of the estate's share to Christine, with adjustment orders concerning Kurri Kurri and Westbrook. Corey is entitled by estoppel and constructive trust to the transfer of the Westbrook property, subject to repayment of debts and indemnity as outlined.

Court Disposition

Orders proposed and to be settled; principal judgment for Christine's family provision claim upheld, Corey's cross-claim upheld, estate's trust cross-claim dismissed

Orders

  • Estate to transfer its interest in the Bishops Bridge property to Christine, making her sole proprietor.
  • Kurri Kurri property to be sold; net proceeds applied first to mortgage, then to discharge Bishops Bridge mortgage, then to capital gains tax, residue split equally between Christine and the estate subject to orders as to costs.