Anderson v Palmer [2002] NSWSC 841

Anderson v Palmer [2002] NSWSC 841

On the evidence, the applicants' connection with the proceedings was too remote to be classed even as contingent creditors, and their interest was insufficient to grant leave under r 2.13 of the Corporations Act Rules.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 September 2002
Procedural Posture
Corporations Winding Up / Application for Leave to Be Heard Under Corporations Act Rules R 2.13
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
['winding Up' 'termination' 'application to Be Heard by Interested Person']
['corporations'] ['winding Up' 'termination' 'application to Be Heard by Interested Person']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Winding Up / Application for Leave to Be Heard Under Corporations Act Rules R 2.13

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the applicants are 'interested persons' under r 2.13 of the Corporations Act Rules entitled to be heard without becoming parties"]

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence, the applicants' connection with the proceedings was too remote to be classed even as contingent creditors, and their interest was insufficient to grant leave under r 2.13 of the Corporations Act Rules.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • ['Applicants to pay the costs of the aborted application']