Mickle v Farley [2013] NSWDC 295
The defamatory social media publications were untrue, significantly hurt the plaintiff and damaged her reputation, and their capacity to spread through Twitter and Facebook increased the harm. Compensatory damages of $85,000 were appropriate, and the defendant's later conduct, including a spurious defence of truth and an unsubstantiated qualified privilege defence, justified aggravated damages of $20,000.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Defamation Action / Assessment of Damages After the Amended Defence Was Struck Out and Judgment Entered for the Plaintiff
- Outcome
- Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $105,000 with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['assessment of Damages' 'defamation Via Twitter and Facebook' 'compensatory Damages' 'aggravated Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Defamation Action / Assessment of Damages After the Amended Defence Was Struck Out and Judgment Entered for the Plaintiff
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What compensatory damages should be awarded for defamatory publications made on Twitter and Facebook.' "Whether the defendant's conduct in response to the claim justified aggravated damages."]
Ratio Decidendi
The defamatory social media publications were untrue, significantly hurt the plaintiff and damaged her reputation, and their capacity to spread through Twitter and Facebook increased the harm. Compensatory damages of $85,000 were appropriate, and the defendant's later conduct, including a spurious defence of truth and an unsubstantiated qualified privilege defence, justified aggravated damages of $20,000.
Court Disposition
Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $105,000 with costs.
Orders
- ['There will be judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $105,000.' "The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings." 'The exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment